You Can Go Home Again

A much too fast visit to my hometown of Pittsburgh began with an overnight stay at the country home of childhood neighbor and rediscovered Facebook friend--and now real friend, David Brady, at his beautiful home in the woods in rural Butler County; then, yesterday, to a Pirates-Phillies game at PNC Park with David and grandson Seth (alas, the Buccos got clobbered 8-2) a walking tour of downtown Pittsburgh starting with a crossing of the Andy Warhol Bridge ending at the Point; and a pilgrimage to the Tree of Life synagogue in beautiful Squirrel Hill; where I had a long and cathartic cry viewing the posters of solidarity and kindness sent by children and adults from Pittsburgh and around America. 

There is something so powerful about connecting with and belonging to community; whether a Jewish community horribly violated by a murderous act of terrorism by a depraved Jew-hater, but then embraced and succored by an outpouring of love and support from the larger community around them sharing their grief or a community of long-suffering Pirates fans coming together to enjoy a ballgame. hold high the Jolly Roger and commiserate with each other that 30-years of losing will end someday. Or a community of a friendship with long-lost neighbor who welcomed me into his home, gave me a ride across his 30 acres on a Quad and allowed me to partake in his world of hunting and self-reliance. so different from my own but discovering heartfelt commonalities as well. Communities distinct and overlapping.

I experienced all of that and more yesterday in my beloved hometown, itself a plucky survivor of hard times that has reinvented itself and is now filled with art, life, great views and good vibes. I left Pittsburgh at the age of 13; yet feel deeply and eternally connected to my vibrant hometown; part of an extended community of Pittsburgh lovers. Welcome home, Walter. 

 

Apotheosis In Dublin

The administrator of the Jeanie Johnston refugee ship from the potato famine era welcomes Bohdan, a 13-year-old Ukrainian refugee, to Ireland

Returned home last night from Dublin deeply moved by the enormous kindness of the Irish people toward the people of Ukraine in their hour of need. Over the past six weeks as many as 30,000 Ukrainian refugees have arrived in Ireland, a country of about 5 million. During our stay of eight days, we heard nothing but expressions of solidarity, compassion and love expressed toward the new arrivals;  often directly to Tanya ‘s sister Nila and her 13 year old son Bohdan who arrived in Ireland in early March and whom we were visiting. We heard not a word in conversations, or in the Irish media, of any indication of resentment toward the new arrivals or toward the generous package of social benefits the government is providing them. What a contrast to the situation in the US, where, despite promises by Biden to take in 100,000 Ukrainians, the U.S. has barely begun the intake process—a sad outgrowth of the overall demonization of immigrants here that has been negatively impacting our politics since at least 2016. 

Nila, Bohdan, Tanya and I experienced a deeply emotional moment during a visit to the Jeanie Johnston, the replica of a ship by that name that brought desperately poor Irish refugees to Canada and America during the Potato Famine of the 1840’s. As we were waiting to board the ship—floating on the Liffey River--for a tour, I mentioned to one of the administrators that the visit was meaningful for all of us because Nila and Bohdan were newly arrived Ukrainian refugees struggling to find their feet in a new land. I also asked him for a recommendation of a good restaurant nearby where we could celebrate Bohdan’s upcoming birthday. In any case, 20 minutes later as the tour began for us and about 30 other tourists from the US, France, Spain, Hungary and elsewhere; the administrator and tour guide made a point of welcoming Nila and Bohdan to Ireland. The administrator, with tears in his eyes, praised them for their courage and steadfastness in making the difficult trip to safety and freedom and expressing the hope and belief that they will quickly find their feet. The two men then presented Bohdan with a birthday card with a fold-out image of the ship. Bohdan is a newly minted teenager who keeps his emotions under control, but as he responded with a heartfelt, emphatic "thank you so much!" I could see how powerful the moment was for him and am sure he will remember it for his entire life. 

Certainly, it is clear to us that the incredibly warm welcome Nila and Bohdan have received from the O’Reilly family—Hugh, Ursula, Adam and Leon---who have taken them into their home and hearts and from the principal, teachers and students in the Irish school Bohdan is attending---is helping them to recover and heal from the massive trauma they suffered in having their lives abruptly turned upside down; being abruptly forced out of their home in Kyiv, separated from their loved ones still in Ukraine and fearing deeply for their safety. Nila and Bohdan have no idea what the future will bring and when they will be able to return home, but they DO already have a solid support structure of love and acceptance in Dublin---and that is a very big deal. For our part, Tanya and I are doing what we can to help support Nila and Bohdan from America and feel uplifted to have spent a beautiful week with them enjoying Dublin and the Wicklow Mountains—allowing them to articulate and sharing in all of the complicated emotions they are experiencing. 

As we begin our observance of Passover, we are deeply moved to be connected these beautiful people who have taken the journey to freedom in Ireland and to all the people of Ukraine who are fighting valiantly against Pharaoh Putin who seeks to destroy their nationhood and reduce them to slave status. Ukrainians are upholding the torch of freedom for all of us and taking horrific human losses in the process. We owe it to them to be by their side in this terrible hour.

BALTIMORE JEWISH TIMES March 31, 2022 Comparing War In Ukraine To Final Solution By Walter Ruby Guest Contributor As a Jew and lover of Israel, I was filled with outrage to read that, in the wake of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s recent Zoom address to the Israeli Knesset, unnamed senior Israeli ministers railed against what they termed Zelensky’s “outrageous comparison” of Hitler’s “final solution” to the Jewish question and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s present effort to snuff out Ukrainian life and liberty. To add insult to injury, the same unnamed officials claimed that “Zelensky also distorted the part his country played in the murder of Jews.” Outrageous comparison? On the contrary. It is a quite apt and accurate one, given that the Russian military has carried out saturation bombing and shelling that has all but leveled the cities of Kharkiv and Mariupol as well many smaller towns and villages, killing thousands. The Russians have deliberately targeted maternity hospitals and theaters and other buildings where desperate civilians are taking shelter. Indeed, the Russian military machine appears intent on crushing Ukrainian resistance and extinguishing Ukrainian peoplehood by wantonly massacring as many Ukrainian civilians as possible, Russian speakers as well as Ukrainian ones, while forcing much of the rest of the Ukrainian population into exile to create a “Ukraine without Ukrainians” that can be colonized by Russia. Zelensky offended some Israeli MKs with his hectoring tone and refusal to openly identify as Jewish. Yet he has clearly thought deeply about the ways that the Holocaust in Ukraine, in which members of his own family were killed, closely resembles Russia’s present-day attempted genocide of the Ukrainian people. In his speech to the Knesset, Zelensky was correct in asserting that “Ukraine and Israel face the same threat from their respective enemies — the total destruction of our people, our state, our culture, even the name: Ukraine, Israel.” He was on target in pointing out that “Our people are now wandering the world, searching for a place, just as you once wandered … seeking security, trying to stay alive, and in peace.” Finally, he was right again in pointing out, “The Russian invasion of Ukraine is not a military operation as it’s presented in Moscow. It is an all-out war, illegitimate, intended to destroy our people, our country, our cities, our culture and our children. Everything that makes Ukrainians Ukrainians.” As to the vexed issue of Ukrainians and the Holocaust, it is undeniable that a minority of Ukrainians did collaborate with the Nazis’ extermination of the Jews during their occupation of Ukraine from 1941-44. Yet the nation-state of Ukraine did not exist during those years and therefore could not have “played a part” in carrying out the mass murder of Jews, as the senior Israeli minister wrongly suggested. Indeed, most Ukrainians joined with Russians, Jews and others to defend their common homeland against the Nazi invaders. Why would anyone with an ounce of rachmanut (compassion) choose this moment, when Ukraine is under genocidal attack from Russia, to visit the sins of a minority of Ukrainians 80 years ago on the valiant Ukrainians of today, fighting against enormous odds to preserve self-determination and democracy? Doing that obviously plays directly into Putin’s false claim that he invaded Ukraine to eradicate Nazism, absurdly presided over, according to the Russian government, by Zelensky himself, who happens to be a Jew. Yes, Ukraine has a radical nationalist right, concentrated in the Svaboda (Freedom) party, but in the first round of the 2019 Ukrainian presidential elections, in which Zelensky, a candidate of Jewish origins, took first place with over 30% of the vote. (He later won the runoff overwhelmingly with 73% of the vote.) The candidate of Svaboda received less than 2%. That is a much lower percentage than the ultranationalist candidates in countries like Germany, France and Italy have received in recent elections. As he has done in recent speeches to the U.S. Congress and German Bundestag, Zelensky criticized his Israeli hosts, pointing to Israel’s refusal to impose sanctions on Moscow or share its Iron Dome with Ukraine. He also made clear his disquiet with Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s unrelenting pressure on him to accept Moscow’s stated terms for allowing the survival of a shrunken, demilitarized Ukraine that would be totally at Putin’s mercy. Seeking to explain the reasons for Bennett’s position of studied neutrality between Russia and Ukraine, Zelensky asked, “What is it? Indifference? Political calculation? Mediation without choosing sides … I want to point out that indifference kills. Calculations can be wrong. You can mediate between countries, but not between good and evil.” Hours after Zelensky spoke, Bennett offered a rejoinder that “I personally believe that it is forbidden to equate the Holocaust to anything.” Yet such pious incantations do nothing to solve the moral issue facing Israel. If Israel refuses to choose between good and evil and instead averts its eyes from the genocide of another people, the Ukrainians, it will be acknowledging that “Never Again” is a meaningless concept, or one that applies only to the Jews. Indeed, Bennett’s cold-blooded realpolitik is staining the honor not only of Israel, but of the entire Jewish people. Jews of conscience have an obligation to speak up now and call out this morally squalid policy for what it is: deeply and enduringly wrong. Walter Ruby is president of Jews and Muslims and Allies Acting Together (JAMAAT). This originally ran in Washington Jewish Week.

In Solidarity With Ukraine and Defense of Democracy

I am sitting in front of my computer at home in Frederick tonight scared and disheartened by the horror that may be about to envelop the beautiful city of Kyiv and its three million plus people, including dear family members. The sheer insanity and malevolence of what may be about to happen feels impossible to absorb. I pray Biden’s presumed laying down the law tomorrow on the phone to Putin on the sweep of planned sanctions that effectively shut down Russia’s oil and gas exports and cut it off from the international banking system may still deter Putin from moving forward with a merciless invasion that would likely kill and wound tens of thousands and traumatize tens of millions.

The purpose of such a murderous display of armed might is clear enough; to blot out the aspirations of Ukrainians to run their own lives and live according to their own lights. Putin apparently fears that Ukrainian self-determination and democracy threatens his own survival as Emperor of all the Russias, and he may be right in that calculation. Clearly Putin and his coterie of ruthless KGB siloviki (tough guys) and avaricious oligarchs aren’t collectively worth the life of even one Ukrainian soldier (and we’ve already lost close to 15,000 of them since the takeover of Crimea and Donbass since 2014). And yet the dictator and his minions are now in a position to cause devastating damage to many more lives and to the threaten the very survival of a sovereign state.

What stays with me vividly tonight are memories of my visit with Tanya to Maidan Square in Kyiv in the spring of 2014, when we had the chance to talk to many of the young people who had risked their own lives and saw many dear friends killed a few weeks earlier in a successful effort to overthrow a venal Russian puppet as dictator of Ukraine and seize control of their own destinies. To have the chance to speak with them and experience their quiet courage, human dignity and advocacy explanation that there are certain ideas and dreams that are worth risking everything for--that experience was one of the privileges of my life. I am sickened to think that their lives are again being put on the line by a brutal and deeply banal dictator for whom 22 years of absolute power is not enough, but who is ready willing to destroy untold thousands more lives—including many of his own soldiers--to ensure he stays in control till the end of his life.

Tonight, it is the people of Ukraine who are confronted with the existential evil of totalitarianism on steroids; but in reality all of us are facing the same peril to human freedom emanating from the loose coalition of nationalist dictatorships and would-be dictators from Mar A Lago and Washington to Ottawa, Budapest, Rio da Janeiro, Jerusalem, Paris, London, Taipei, Mumbai and on and on. Today, human freedom is truly imperiled everywhere and this is the moment for believers in human freedom to join hands and fight in its defense with fortitude for the sake of our children and children’s children. I am a lifelong pacifist and anti-Cold Warrior but feel in my old bones that if we allow Putin to successfully invade and absorb Ukraine, democracy will be on life-support worldwide. We must stand with Ukraine.

3David Miley, George Zilberman and 1 other

1 Comment

Like

Comment

Share

Saigon 1975, Kabul 2021 and Me

 

Watching the shocking entrance of the Taliban into Kabul today, as Afghan president Ashraf Ghani fled the country and chaos reigned in the city, takes me vividly back to April 30, 1975, the day that Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong. Then too we witnessed chaotic scenes—encapsulated in the image of U.S.  Embassy personal contractors and desperate Vietnamese allies climbing a perilous ladder onto the roof and then scrambling onto helicopters for the flight out.  

I must acknowledge that I—then a 25-year-old self-described radical who had been involved in anti-Vietnam protests for ten years---cried tears of joy as I walked the streets of Madison, Wisconsin that day; elated by the military victory of the National Liberation Front and North Vietnamese army which had fought with tremendous steadfastness and courage for over a decade against the world’s strongest military power to liberate their country. Looking back, I have ambivalent feelings about my ecstatic response to the humiliation of my own country, which was reeling in the realization that it had lost a war for the first time in its history. (Afghanistan is clearly the second). In fact, I still believe, as I did then, that the U.S. war effort in Vietnam was immoral and destructive of both that country and our own. Yet a lot went down in the ensuing months and years that nowadays causes me to recoil whenever I look back on my ‘tears of joy’ moment. 

First, I was shaken when reading accounts of the crackdown on free expression by the ‘liberators’ of Vietnam, who dispatched hundreds of thousands of their fellow countrymen sent to ‘re-education’ camps. Still, I noted that the U.S.-backed South Vietnamese regime had also been dictatorial—and deeply corrupt to boot. Then came the horror of the Khmer Rouge genocide in Cambodia, a grotesque outbreak of murderous savagery which, like the Cultural Revolution in China in the 1960s and Stalin’s massive purges in the 1930s, showed vividly that absolute power, even when clad in Marxian garb, indeed corrupts absolutely. I shudder that I had once lionized brutal killers.

During the 1980’s. I made four trips to the Soviet Union as a journalist to visit with and report on Jewish refuseniks persecuted for speaking out against an anti-Semitic regime that denied them the right to emigrate. During the first decade of the 21^st Century, while working as an advocate for strengthening Muslim-Jewish relations, I came to belatedly understand that America, a multi-racial and multi-religious country where immigrants from anywhere have the opportunity to feel become fully American and realize the American dream; operates a model intrinsically superior to that of Europe, where it is infinitely more difficult for immigrants, including Muslims, Black Africans and Asians, to achieve full acceptance simply because they aren’t ethnically  French, Italian, German or Swedish.

Having buttressed myself in a newfound appreciation for America and its founding vision, I was horrified by the rise of Trump and white ethno-nationalism. Yet the emergence and still-extant peril of American fascism led me to the determination to fight to preserve America’s promise, rather than reverting to my youthful anti-Americanism. Nowadays, I affirm that America, warts and all, is a force for good in the world, an indispensable player in the struggle to averting a grim, authoritarian future for humanity,

So today, I am decidedly not crying tears of joy over the fall of Kabul. On the contrary, I am repulsed by the triumph of the Taliban and their sinister ideology, and fearful that Afghanistan will now revert to a deranged medievalist vision of an Islamic emirate with women reduced to the level of chattel; light years from the liberating version of Islam that I have absorbed from many Muslim friends with whom I have worked. Tragically, it now appears the retrograde jihadi vision will be energized around the world by its victory in Afghanistan; just as happened with the rise of ISIS in 2014. I fear for the fates of westernized Afghans of both sexes who believed they could build a progressive and humanistic Afghanistan, America nurtured these beautiful souls and then abruptly abandoned them to their fates.

Still, it is unlikely that things would have ended any differently if the U.S. had postponed its withdrawal one year or five years, Despite the myriad differences between Vietnam and Afghanistan and between the ideologies of communism and jihadism, the falls of Saigon and Kabul 46 years apart vividly show the folly of the US seeking to impose our will through puppet regimes in countries hostile to our values and determined to achieve self-determination. As one observer noted today, the Taliban fighters fought out of deep and abiding belief, while the Afghan army recruits fought for money. In both Vietnam and Afghanistan, a huge part of that belief was about driving out foreign—i.e. American—invaders, just as the rag tag Afghans also improbably accomplished against the British in the 19^th Century and the Soviets in the 1980’s.

On the other hand, all may not be lost in Afghanistan. It is hard to see how a Taliban-run Afghanistan can survive outside the international system. All of Afghanistan’s neighbors, including Pakistan, India, Russia, China and even Iran, look with trepidation at the emergence of a proselytizing jihadist regime near their borders. The empowerment of a generation of Afghan women is an established fact that will be hard to turn back completely.

History shows us that over time revolutionary fervor fades and once-radicalized nations join the international system, as Vietnam did in the 1980’s and 1990’s. My own evolution, like so many of my contemporaries, from an anti-American radical to a liberal who believes in harnessing American power to achieve a democratic world order, is a piece of that same process. There will continue to be major bumps and setbacks along the way, but I continue to believe with Martin Luther King that the arc of history ultimately bends toward justice. While mourning today’s tragic events in Afghanistan, all of us must recommit to buttressing freedom, building a more just societal order and to saving our shared planet.     

 

 

 

Ben and Jerry's Positive Step and Israel's Over-the_Top Response

 

Stuff and nonsense! That's my response to Israeli President Isaac Herzog's overheated claim that Ben and Jerry's decision not to distribute its ice cream in the occupied Palestinian territories amounts to "a new form of terrorism." The announced decision by the ice cream firm from Vermont to discontinue distributing its product in areas that Israel has illegally occupied for 54 years and filled with settlers, even while making clear that it intends to continue its operations inside Israel proper, is not, as Herzog claims "economic terrorism that tries to harm Israeli citizens and the Israeli economy" but is rather a principled stand in support of the right to self-determination by Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem and the West Bank who are harmed daily by living under occupation.

To be clear, I myself am opposed to BDS calls for a total economic boycott of Israel until it agrees to conditions that would amount to its undoing like the the Right of Return of 1948 refugees and their descendants to all of Israel. However, I support an economic boycott of the settlements as something long overdue. If there is something we have learned clearly over the past half century, unless there are costs--political and economic-- exacted for the settlement enterprise it will continue and expand. As Meretz MK Yair Golan, a former IDF chief of staff, put it: “As someone who knows terrorism and has been fighting terrorism all his life, what is happening in the international arena is not terrorism. We must fight against the boycott with one hand, and for a two-state solution with the other....An ice cream boycott is not terrorism,” Golan added.

Even more disturbing than Herzog's rhetorical excess is the call by Foreign Minister Yair Lapid for 33 US states that have passed anti-BDS legislation to now come after Ben and Jerry's in their own jurisdictions, even though, as pointed out, Ben and Jerry's stand is very different from BDS. In other words, a private U.S.-based company that decides not to distribute its product in areas under Israeli control that are not recognized as part of the Israel by the U.S. government) should now by punished by US states? Since when did it become illegal an American business to decide not to do business in certain territories abroad?

I repeat that I am not for BDS, but I strongly oppose its criminalization. Since the Tea Party (the 18th Century version), organizing economic boycotts of governments and companies involved in wrongful actions has been a part of the American scene. Are we going to say its OK to boycott California grapes as so many of us did in the 1970's to protest the treatment of farm workers, but not OK for a company like Ben and Jerry's to specify that they don't want their ice cream sold in Israeli settlements set up illegally in occupied Palestinian land? That's completely mishugah, crazy!.

 

 

JCRC’s overblown denunciation of Abrar Omeish chills interfaith relations

By

 -

 -

June 9, 2021

3

 

Share

A screenshot from Fairfax County Public Schools video titled “Meet the School Board: Abrar Omeish.”

By Walter Ruby and Gary Sampliner

Special to WJW

In “Principle and courage under fire” (Editorial, May 25), WJW applauded the decision of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington to rescind its award for promoting faith equity to Fairfax County School Board member Abrar Omeish, as an act of “principle over expediency, showing communal leadership and purpose.”

While the JCRC certainly had every right to rescind its award to Omeish, the statement it released to explain its unusual action was far more destructive than helpful to its mission of “building interfaith respect, cooperation, allyship and friendship.”

As the editorial notes, on May 13, at the height of the brutal conflict between Israel and Hamas, Omeish tweeted and posted on Facebook a celebratory message for the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Fitr that ends the month of Ramadan; yet added the following words: “Hurts my heart to celebrate while Israel kills Palestinians & desecrates the Holy Land right now. Apartheid & colonization were wrong yesterday and will be today, here and there. May justice + truth prevail.”

Many of Omeish’s Jewish constituents, including rabbis and community leaders, responded with declarations of the hurt they felt over the harshness of her denunciation of Israel, and omission of any countervailing criticism of Hamas for indiscriminate rocket fire at Israel.

Get Washington Jewish Week Newsletter by email and never miss our top stories
We do not share data with third party vendors.FREE SIGN UP

Omeish responded the next day by tweeting a more conciliatory message, saying in part, “War is terrible for everyone. I hear those hurting. I’m here for each of you…. I look ahead to robust & empathetic engagement with Jewish leaders.”

While she did not say anything specifically critical of Hamas’ actions or empathetic to Israelis, Omeish at least made clear she understood her comments had hurt some Jewish constituents and showed her continued willingness to work for and with them.

Nevertheless, given Omeish’s unwillingness to condemn Hamas or express compassion for Israelis, we can understand why JCRC decided to rescind its award. Unfortunately, JCRC went much further than revoking the award for those reasons. In an accompanying statement, it termed Omeish’s comments “hateful,” and asserted that by posting them on social media she “disenfranchised the thousands of Jewish families in her district” through language that is “deeply offensive and inflammatory to all who support Israel.”

Using words that are certain to be cited by the Fairfax Republican party and others who are demanding that Omeish be removed from the school board over her criticism of Israel, JCRC accused her of making statements “that target and marginalize Jewish students and their families and divide our community,” adding, “Her actions constituted a dereliction of her duty and they compromise the entire Board. She should be held accountable.”

The JCRC’s defenestration of Omeish didn’t stop there. Omitting mention of her conciliatory tweet, the JCRC leveled a false accusation that “she has continued to stoke the flames of division and acrimony,” because she did not take down her initial tweet or take steps satisfactory to the JCRC to stem subsequent “vitriolic, hateful rhetoric on social media triggered by her remarks” — much of which, ironically, was aimed against her.

We recognize the argument that public officials of a local school board should take care to avoid making public statements on issues outside of their official purview that may inflame and offend some of their constituencies. And one can legitimately criticize Omeish’s failure to acknowledge the terror inflicted on Israel by Hamas and the over-simplification of describing Israel’s relationship with the Palestinians as “apartheid & colonization.”

Yet we do not think anyone has reason to question the genuineness of Omeish’s anguish over the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians in Israeli bombing of apartment buildings in Gaza or her horror over repeated Israeli police raids at the Al-Aqsa Mosque that Muslims around the world believe desecrated the third-holiest Islamic shrine in the world.

We are most deeply disturbed that the JCRC accused Omeish of everything short of an antisemitic attack against her Jewish constituents. In what way did Omeish’s May 13 tweet “disenfranchise[,] . . .target and marginalize Jewish students and their families” in Fairfax County? The JCRC doesn’t say, and we can see nothing in her tweets to support these conclusions. Does JCRC mean to convey the message that if elected Muslim officials dare to criticize actions of the Israeli government, they should expect a pressure campaign virtually accusing them of incitement against the Jewish community?

Indeed, we have heard concerns expressed by leaders of the Muslim community, with whom we have worked for years to strengthen Muslim-Jewish relations in Northern Virginia, that if they speak honestly about their dismay over recent Israeli actions, they, too, may be accused of incitement. Unfortunately, the over-the-top JCRC condemnation of Omeish could spread fear and serves to chill the free and candid speech we need if we are to build genuine interfaith harmony.

If the JCRC indeed “deeply values its relationships with our Muslim friends and neighbors” and is “committed to engaging with empathy, discretion, and sensitivity” with them, as it claims in its statement about

Omeish, it needs to grapple with the sad reality that its own vitriolic accusations have the potential to set back Muslim-Jewish relations in northern Virginia — long among the most extensive in the U.S. — for some time to come.

Walter Ruby and Gary Sampliner are members of the executive board of JAMAAT (Jews and Muslims and Allies Acting Together), a grassroots interfaith body in the Washington region.